Friday, May 31, 2019

Orthodox Society :: essays research papers

By insisting on complete orthodoxy is confederacy only hurting itself? I believe when a society demands orthodoxy it is asking for problems. Orthodoxy to a small extent shadower be helpful to society, yet when it is required by the people, and they demand it to the fullest it can do nothing but cause problems. There is many reasons whey complete orthodoxy only hurts society. First off, it greatly diminishes all forms of creativity among the people and doesnt allow for new ideas that can help benefit society. It also reduces the overall intelligence of the people. When it comes to orthodoxy and religion, it can weaken the quality of worship and the persons relationship with God. In general, orthodoxy in a way sets limits to progress and development of society and doesnt allow new ideas to become sure or acknowledged.Orthodoxy is defined as what is traditional or the open up faith in society. It is following what is the commonly accepted, customs and beliefs. The one thing that o rthodoxy almost completely wipes out and discourages is creativity and new ideas that can be expert to society. Only traditional beliefs are accepted in an orthodox society. So even if a brilliant idea is introduced, it wont be accepted just because it is new and different. The rate of progress among orthodox society is slowed greatly because of this. If we never accepted new ideas or anything not of the traditional beliefs, we would not be even close to where we are today. Our knowledge of life in general would be nothing like it is today. We are where we are today because of people who came up with new and crazy ideas. All of the great intellectuals were anything but orthodox in their beliefs. Many people who have helped society the most by new ideas and inventions were looked at as crazy during their lifetime. If we are accepting of new ideas it is the only way we are going to progress.Complete orthodoxy also lowers our intelligence and acceptance of other people. When soulfuln ess is only taught one way to do things, they are not educate of other ways of life. No one can truly be considered educated if they have only been taught one side of the story. Imagine if we were taught all our life that blacks or Mexicans are bad, and no other belief was accepted.

Thursday, May 30, 2019

Chance Or Planning Essay -- essays research papers

Chance or prepIntelligence and stick outning be necessary factors in scientific research, however pass off and luck ar also important and somewhat necessary factors. The record of Charles Darwin and the memoir, The Double Helix, written byJames Watson, prove this assertion. Charles Darwin, James Watson and FrancisCrick were all(a) intelligent workforce that think their experiments, however without gamble and luck their supremacy and scientific achievement would not be as great.Intelligence and planning are important in scientific discovery, but are not perpetually the dominating forces that drive scientific research. Such is the casewith Charles Darwin, James Watson and Francis Crick. All trey of these menwere extremely intellectual, but their intellect only contributed partially totheir success. savvy and planning, combined with possibility and luckcontributed to their overall success.People take chances on a daily basis. If you actually stop and think about it, feel is oneness big game of chance. It is by chance that we are born, that wecontinue to survive, and that we will at long last die. Some people feel thatthis cycle occurs do to the will of God, some others, handle Charles Darwin committhat it happens based on chance or natural selection. Whatever you believe ordisbelieve, life cannot be planned. No matter how hard a person attempts to"plan" their cut in life, it is by chance and luck where that path takes us.Darwins career was also based on chance, not planning. Darwin never planned tobecome a scientist or the father of natural selection. It was by pure chancethat he obtained the job on the sail of the Beagle, which started his career.Darwin stated about this voyage that, "The voyage of the Beagle has been the by distant the or so important event in my life and has determined my whole career. . ."(Darwin, p.76) Darwin had not planned to take the trip on the Beagle, heobtained the opportunity by mere chance. One can attempt to "plan" for a job orcareer, but chance and luck are the major factors which allow for success.Although Darwins intellect played a role in obtaining the position, chance andluck were the major factors.Many scientists suffer great strokes of luck. Two other scientists that didnot "plan" their success were James Watson and Francis Crick. These t... ...major contributing factors.Charles Darwin said that his, ". . . success as a man of science, whatever thismay reserve amounted to, has been determined, as far as I can judge, by complex anddiversified mental qualities and conditions. Of these the most important havebeen - the love of science - unbounded patience in long reflecting over anysubject - industry in observing and roll up facts - and a fair share ofinvention as well as common sense. With such moderate abilities as I possess,it is truly surprising that and so I should have influenced to a considerableextent the beliefs of scientific men on some i mportant points." (Darwin, p. 145)Although Darwin stated his theory with clear and concise arguments, it was bychance that people believed him, considering he could not plan for his futuresuccess.Although planning is somewhat important in scientific research and discovery,chance plays a lots more important role. Without chance most scientificdiscoveries would not have happened. John Lennon was quoted as stating, "Lifeis what happens as we make other plans." Science is more like life. One cannot plan for it, it just takes place. Chance Or Planning Essay -- essays research papers Chance or PlanningIntelligence and planning are necessary factors in scientific research, howeverchance and luck are also important and somewhat necessary factors. TheAutobiography of Charles Darwin and the memoir, The Double Helix, written byJames Watson, prove this assertion. Charles Darwin, James Watson and FrancisCrick were all intelligent men that planned their experiments, however withoutchance and luck their success and scientific achievement would not be as great.Intelligence and planning are important in scientific discovery, but are notalways the dominating forces that drive scientific research. Such is the casewith Charles Darwin, James Watson and Francis Crick. All three of these menwere extremely intellectual, but their intellect only contributed partially totheir success. Intellect and planning, combined with chance and luckcontributed to their overall success.People take chances on a daily basis. If you actually stop and think about it,life is one big game of chance. It is by chance that we are born, that wecontinue to survive, and that we will eventually die. Some people feel thatthis cycle occurs do to the will of God, others, like Charles Darwin believethat it happens based on chance or natural selection. Whatever you believe ordisbelieve, life cannot be planned. No matter how hard a person attempts to"plan" their path in life, it is by chance and luck where that path takes us.Darwins career was also based on chance, not planning. Darwin never planned tobecome a scientist or the father of natural selection. It was by pure chancethat he obtained the job on the voyage of the Beagle, which started his career.Darwin stated about this voyage that, "The voyage of the Beagle has been the byfar the most important event in my life and has determined my whole career. . ."(Darwin, p.76) Darwin had not planned to take the trip on the Beagle, heobtained the opportunity by mere chance. One can attempt to "plan" for a job orcareer, but chance and luck are the major factors which allow for success.Although Darwins intellect played a role in obtaining the position, chance andluck were the major factors.Many scientists suffer great strokes of luck. Two other scientists that didnot "plan" their success were James Watson and Francis Crick. These t... ...major contributing factors.Charles Darwin said that his, ". . . success as a man of science, whatever thismay have amounted to, has been determined, as far as I can judge, by complex anddiversified mental qualities and conditions. Of these the most important havebeen - the love of science - unbounded patience in long reflecting over anysubject - industry in observing and collecting facts - and a fair share ofinvention as well as common sense. With such moderate abilities as I possess,it is truly surprising that thus I should have influenced to a considerableextent the beliefs of scientific men on some important points." (Darwin, p. 145)Although Darwin stated his theory with clear and concise arguments, it was bychance that people believed him, considering he could not plan for his futuresuccess.Although planning is somewhat important in scientific research and discovery,chance plays a much more important role. Without chance most scientificdiscoveries would not have happened. John Lennon was quoted as stating, "Lifeis wh at happens as we make other plans." Science is much like life. One cannot plan for it, it just takes place.

Wednesday, May 29, 2019

The Issue of Money in The Tempest and Othello :: William Shakespeare The Tempest Othello Essays

The Issue of Money in The Tempest and OthelloThe central issue depicted in twain plays The Tempest and Othello is about money. Money in substantial amounts can represent great power and strength over the ruling nation. It plays a major character in our everyday society and one that is fully illustrated in both of Shakespe atomic number 18s play. Both of the plays ar related to his matter, in that the subplot characters attempt to achieve tall respect and, therefore, gain power and strength by deception.A parallelism can be drawn between the characters of Caliban, Trinculo and Stephano from The Tempest to Othello with Iago, Othello involved. Both of these scenes illustrate how the characters Caliban and Othello are easily fooled by deception. What these characters, from both plays, Trinculo and Stephano and Iago do have in common are their evil intentions and conspiracys to gain power by deceiving others to call back in them fully. Caliban, a half human and half beast, is eas ily fooled by the two men, the derivatives of a higher civilization. Trinculo and Stephano have to plans to turn every situation into their throw advantage. Although, Caliban possesses much more intellect than those two roguish members labeled as civilized, he submits to the story that they help Caliban murder his deceitful master, Prospero. He declares that Prospero, a skillful magician has wrongfully taken over the island he had inherited from his mother Sycorax. Caliban is not at all appreciative of what Prospero gives to him because he says You taught me language (1,2,362) precisely and because he must obey (1,2,371) or else Prospero will inflict pain on him. Caliban immediately declares Trinculo and Stephano as his new master as he gleefully sings a song celebrating their initial meetings. Caliban is deceived into believing that Trinculo and Stephano will deliver their promises when in fact those two so called nobleman had another beneficial matter in mind. It is Stephanos and Trinculo gift of liquor to Caliban that makes him believe that they are from a higher sociable class. In return Caliban has fallen from an almost intellect into the lowest social being, while Trinculo and Stephano have gained their respect, therefore they have the ability to take control over Caliban. In Othello, the same situation is drawn in that Othello and Caliban from The Tempest are both victimized because of their lack of judgement.